*To*: scott constable <sdconsta at syr.edu>*Subject*: Re: [isabelle] Verify the legitimacy of a proof?*From*: "C. Diekmann" <diekmann at in.tum.de>*Date*: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 20:27:07 +0200*Cc*: "isabelle-users at cl.cam.ac.uk" <isabelle-users at cl.cam.ac.uk>*In-reply-to*: <CADYF24fBE5-wFje-T9-z2c9Um4ZGf1y+ukaSiDi3EPa9uRBEaw@mail.gmail.com>*References*: <CADYF24fBE5-wFje-T9-z2c9Um4ZGf1y+ukaSiDi3EPa9uRBEaw@mail.gmail.com>*Sender*: c.diekmann at googlemail.com

> That is, I want to ensure that no lemma in the > proof tree ended with "sorry", If you make a command line run with `isabelle build`, every use of `sorry` is counted as cheating and makes the build fail (but only at the end of the build, not at the time when the thy with the sorry is processed). This raises a new question: can I enable cheating (quick_and_dirty) mode in a command line build? One question answered, one not answered, one new problem ;-) Cheers, Cornelius

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [isabelle] Verify the legitimacy of a proof?***From:*Simon Wimmer

**Re: [isabelle] Verify the legitimacy of a proof?***From:*Makarius

**References**:**[isabelle] Verify the legitimacy of a proof?***From:*scott constable

- Previous by Date: [isabelle] Verify the legitimacy of a proof?
- Next by Date: Re: [isabelle] State of the State Monad
- Previous by Thread: [isabelle] Verify the legitimacy of a proof?
- Next by Thread: Re: [isabelle] Verify the legitimacy of a proof?
- Cl-isabelle-users July 2017 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
- Cl-isabelle-users list archive Table of Contents
- More information about the Cl-isabelle-users mailing list